Tag Archives: Plastic surgery

Show me the goods!

Only two weeks to go until my exchange surgery! I am so excited. Can’t wait to be on the other side of this thing. I’m looking forward to being finished. I report to the hospital at 7:30am, for a 9:30am surgery, on Tuesday, September 3rd.

Pre-op appointment

Met with Dr. M this afternoon for my pre-op appointment. Discussed a few more details, got my pictures taken, signed the familiar consent forms, got the don’t-take-these-meds sheet, had my blood drawn, and peed in a cup.

Here are a few of my final questions:

  • QuestionWill I be required to wear any type of bra (compressions or underwire) after the exchange surgery? Should I purchase something? No. If any type of compression is needed it will be via ace bandage and dressings or a mastectomy bra that will be issued by the hospital.
  • I have hypertrophic-ish spots on my incision scars from the mastectomy, should I use something special after the exchange to prevent this from happening? The lumpy scar tissue will be removed during the exchange surgery. Since the pockets are already created/expanded, there won’t be as much stress on the incisions going forward. Silicone sheets? That’s an option that will apply pressure to the incisions to keep them flat. We will revisit once they close.
  • What about this ugly, scarred tissue from the area that was necrotic? Depending on how much skin is loose/available after the implants are placed, we may be able to remove the chunk now. Otherwise, a skin graft from the hip area is an option, but that would need to happen at a later time.
  • And the most important question: will I have drains again? Yes. That wiped the smile off my face. Noooooooooooo! I was hoping I would never see a surgical drain again.

For my photo session today, I removed everything except my underpants. This is the third set of full body pics we’ve taken, but it was still weird. While standing on a pedestal I was thinking of this XKCD strip Lannis shared a little while ago and giggling. Where are my beads? I earned them!

Source: xkcd.com

Choosing implants

Saline versus silicone? Teardrop or round? Will high profile give enough projection? Choosing implants has been a popular topic in the Prophylactic Mastectomy Facebook group this week. While reviewing feedback of some of the other Ladies, I found myself questioning the choices I’ve made. After looking over my little list yet again, I reaffirmed that I have made the best decision for me. Here are the winners upvote and the losers downvote.

QuestionDisclaimer: Each person may give different levels of importance to the factors I list below and should discuss their options with their plastic surgeon. It is not my intention to convey that choosing anything different than what I chose is wrong. I am just presenting my logic. Right, wrong, or just plain stupid. 🙂 As always, I welcome your feedback!

Implant type

Factor Saline Silicone
Durability downvote upvote
Incision size upvote downvote
Chance of rippling downvote upvote
Natural feel downvote upvote
Sloshing downvote upvote
Leak detection upvote downvote

All the hoopla about the link between silicone implants and connective tissue disease, breast cancer, or reproductive issues is just that .. hoopla and unproven. It still caused the moratorium on use of silicone implants in the US in 1992, though. Because of this, breast implants are the most tested medical device out there. The moratorium was lifted in 2006. See FDA’s Update on the Safety of Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants for more details.

BreastReconstructionGuidebookTab6_1In any case, both types of implants are encased in a silicone shell. The one encasing the silicone implant is solid, but the saline one has a port (salines are inserted deflated and filled with fluid; silicones are pre-filled). Also, salines are more prone to ripple, causing folds in the shell. These two vulnerabilities are the causes of higher failure rates of saline implants. Although they come out on the bottom here, problems with silicone implants are more difficult to detect. Regular MRI screenings for “silent ruptures” are recommended for patients with these types of implants.

On the aesthetic side of the equation, the incisions needed for salines are smaller, but they are firmer and have been reported to produce a “sloshing” noise.

Implant shape

Factor Round Anatomical
Natural appearance downvote upvote
Natural feel/motion upvote downvote
Higher projection upvote downvote
Complication due to turning upvote downvote

From the various photos I have seen, I am not convinced that there is much difference in the aesthetic outcome, but in my head it makes more sense that anatomical (teardrop) implants have a more natural shape, so I gave them the upvote. While both shapes are filled with cohesive gel, the degree of viscosity varies between the round and teardrop versions. Teardrops may look better, but they are firmer due to the gel being more form-stable (read: solid). This consistency is what gives the implants the “gummy bear” moniker.

Whether saline or silicone, implants come not only in different shapes, but also either smooth or textured surfaces, as well as different projections. Due to the distribution of the gel within the implant shell, the same volume of silicone produces a higher projection in a round implant versus a teardrop one. The higher the projection, the narrower the base. With a 29″ rib cage, I need narrow implants and the round version offers the highest projection: ultra high.

And lastly, the fact that corrective surgery is required if the implant turns is a big one for me. When a round implant turns, you can’t tell, but if a teardrop is loose within its pocket, it is obvious. With the current state of my expanders (one sits higher than the other), I am nervous about this possible issue and want to avoid it.

So there you have it: I chose round silicone implants.

Check out this awesome video showing the difference between regular round silicone implants and their anatomical counterparts.

This is a video of me playing with a round implant that has been ruptured. You can see that this type of implant is also cohesive enough to not leak outside of the shell. It retracts just as the anatomical implant in the above video.

Source of Table 6.1: Steligo, Kathy. Breast Reconstruction Guidebook: Issues and Answers from Research to Recovery. Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012. Print, third edition.

So what size are you?

It’s strange how often I have heard this question. Yes, I had a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy, and yes, my boobs seem to be growing right before your eyes, but this question is not appropriate for watercooler chat. We’re not that chummy! How would you like it if I asked your wife her bra size? Kind of weird, no? Apparently not. If I had a Dollar …

Quest markerThe times I actually did answer this question, the only measurement I had was the volume in ccs. Unless you’re one of “us,” this don’t mean jack, so after yet another time I fielded this question, I decided to go on a quest and figure out exactly what the magic number was.

How I measured my cup size

A lot of women make an appointment for a fitting by someone who knows what they’re doing (usually Nordstrom lingerie department). I have not yet taken this step, because I’m not completely finished. Off to Google and the FaceBook groups I went. There seem to be a few different ways to do this. One of the ladies in a FB group, who is familiar with the topic, was happy to assist.

Bust measurement

Source: Jason Lee, RealSimple.com

Without a top, I first measured the underbust, which is the lower yellow line in the graphic = 29″.

Traditional sizing says to add 4″ if even number or 5″ if odd number.  Modern sizing rounds up to the next even number. We went with modern sizing, so that brought me to 30.

Then I measured at the top yellow line, which is the widest part of the bust = 36″.

The math: subtract the underbust from the bust. The difference is what determines size, with each inch representing one cup size. 1 = A, 2 = B, 3 = C, etc.

Ladies and gentlemen, we have our verdict: 30 DDD. Yes, that’s right D D D. I was shocked when we came to this conclusion. I still am. I was not expecting this at all. Having been wearing an A cup bra pre-op, triple Ds just seem ridiculous to me. I never had a number or letter in mind when thinking about reconstruction. I was of the mindset that I would keep expanding until things seemed just right. I hit that point at about 400ccs. Having read a lot of feedback of women feeling that they should’ve gone bigger, I told my plastic surgeon that the sweet spot was 450ccs. Since I’m getting round implants, we overfilled by 100 for a total of 550ccs. It’s at the overfill point that I measure a DDD, so this isn’t the final FINAL verdict. I will get a professional fitting a couple of months after my exchange, once things settle down. Stay tuned!

Here’s an interesting graphic related to cup size. A 30F on me is a 38C on someone with a larger ribcage/underbust. It’s all about body size and proportion.

Cup size and proportion

Done, DONE, D O N E – ninth expansion

WARNING: NSFW / graphic content below.

I am officially finished with the expansions! YES! We added the final 25ccs to each expander, for a total of 550ccs/side. I am so ecstatic to have reached this milestone. I was really hoping to be completely done late Spring/early Summer, but my rebel nipple Dusky and his pal necrosis had other plans. Six months after my prophylactic bilateral mastectomy on January 22, 2013, I am finally done with fills! This is what I’m doing right now:

What’s next?

  • 7/31: follow up to make sure I haven’t decided that I want to go bigger
  • 8/19: pre-op appointment
  • 9/03: the long-awaited exchange surgery!!!

That’s a lot of fills!

2013_7_19 fills

100 + 50 +75 +75 + 50 + 50 + 50 + 50 + 25 + 25 = 550ccs

Eighth expansion

WARNING: NSFW / graphic content below.

I can almost smell it: the end of the expansion process. This was supposed to be my final expansion, however I wimped out and we only added 25ccs to each expander, for a total of 525ccs/side. The goal is 550ccs, so I have another appointment for the final FINAL expansion in one week.

GravityThe reason for halving the volume is pain. The last expansion brought on a lot of pain. Not that I thought it was going to get more pleasant, but it was pretty bad. As usual, the worst of it come early in the morning. I’ve never dreaded getting out of bed so much. As soon as I sat up, gravity would work its magic. Talk about grumpy mornings.

The pressure was intense and I was on ibuprofen for about three days after. It didn’t help that we spent that weekend camping, so I was not sleeping in my own comfy bed. I really thought if someone poked me, a foob would pop. I even had a dream that my cat sat on my chest and the thing just blew up under her. Not like a slow deflation, but a violent explosion! I woke up in a sweat and immediately groped my chest to make sure everything was still there. Whew!

Enjoy the pics. It’s getting crowded down there!

2013_7_12 Fills

100 + 50 +75 +75 + 50 + 50 + 50 + 50 + 25 = 525ccs

Extra! Extra! Seventh expansion

WARNING: NSFW / graphic content below.

The Virginian-PilotThe story I mentioned in my last post, has been published in Sunday’s edition of The Virginian-Pilot. “At-risk local women take the fight to breast cancer” features stories of the two local FORCE coordinators and mentions this very blog. Check it out.

In other news, I am definitely over the hill with the expansions. I reached the size I’d like to be after the exchange surgery with my last expansion that brought me to 450ccs and am now in the overfilling stage. My seventh expansion added 50ccs to each expander, for a total of 500ccs/sideThere is one more 50cc fill left. I don’t  know how that’s going to go. I feel like any minute now, these foobs are going to pop!

No surprise that this was the most painful expansion thus far. After previous fills I usually had a shitty Saturday morning, but did not really think about it by Sunday afternoon. Today is Monday and I did not have a pleasant morning. I slept fine, but I was feeling pain as soon as I sat up in bed after waking up. Gravity … I hate your face right now! I am both looking forward to and dreading the final expansion in three weeks.

2013_6_21 Fills

100 + 50 +75 +75 + 50 + 50 + 50 + 50 = 500ccs

Sixth expansion

WARNING: NSFW / graphic content below.

Yup, I’m done size-wise. I wasn’t 100% sure after the fifth expansion, but I’m 200% sure now. 50ccs have been added to each expander, for a total of 450ccs/side.

After the last expansion brought me to 400ccs, I was quite happy with the result and declared that this is what size I’d like to be after the exchange. However, the feedback on pre versus post-exchange size has been pretty consistent: when you think you’re done, do a little extra; implants sit different and will be a bit smaller than the expanders. So here we are, at 450ccs.

What’s next? Two more expansions are in my future. My PS overfills by 100ccs in order to overstretch the skin and muscle. This ultimately gives a more natural result post-exchange surgery.

Here they are after six expansions.

2013_6_7 fills

100 + 50 +75 +75 + 50 + 50 + 50 = 450ccs

Fifth expansion

WARNING: NSFW / graphic content below.

In other news: I had my fifth expansion. 50ccs have been added to each expander, for a total of 400ccs/side. We’re getting there.

184ccs vs. 400ccs

184ccs (pre-op) vs. 400ccs

I am very happy with how these things are looking so far. Compared to how expanders usually look on women, mine have a pretty natural shape. A bit lop-sided, with righty higher up than lefty, because of how the internal pockets healed post-op. The right pocket closed up a little bit on the bottom, so the expander sits higher in my chest, but it’s not too bad. This will be fixed during the exchange surgery in September.

I have a few more decisions to make before September. Mainly: will I get silicone or saline implants, what shape will they be, and what am I going to do about my nipples. If you’ve been following me for a bit (or can tell from the photos), you know that I lost one of my nipples to necrosis. I need to figure out what I’m going to do about it. The options are:

  • Nothing
  • Reconstruct the lost nipple via skin graft or skate flap
  • Get a 3D tattoo
  • Remove the other nipple

I can’t decide what is best. On one hand, I went through all this trouble, so why give up now, but on the other, I just don’t think I’m going to like the aesthetic result if I do nothing or reconstruct/tattoo just one. What’s more awkward than two hard nipples? ONE! I like symmetry. I think I’m going to remove the other one and maybe reconstruct them both. Not 100% on that though. We shall see.

Here are the pics. Big difference between what 100ccs looked like after my mastectomy in January and the 400ccs I have today.

2013_5_24 fills

100 + 50 +75 +75 + 50 + 50 = 400ccs

Semantics or why I hate the phrase “Angie’s gene”

Since Angelina Jolie decided to share her story, revealing that she underwent a prophylactic mastectomy and is a carrier of a BRCA1 gene mutation, I have been reading and privately reacting to all of the articles, blog posts, TV clips, radio interviews, and the commentary attached to them. Majority of the pieces are positive, some are negative, some are straight up offensive, some convey plain ignorance, and some are just wrong. I have been jotting down (on a napkin) the things that I wanted to address and planned on doing that on this blog.

Until yesterday … when I came across this blog post by Amber, who writes redd in the cities, It is just brilliant and captures everything (and more) that I wanted to share. Please take a few minutes to read Semantics or why I hate the phrase “Angie’s gene” and stop by Amber’s blog to learn more about her and her story.

Reblogged from redd in the cities:

explicitsemanticsLast week, I decided I wanted a reuben sandwich, and I was missing sauerkraut. Now, for my reubens, not just any sauerkraut will do. Nope, I have to have the best stuff, and there’s only one place I know of that carries it nearby. So I got in my car, strapped myself in, drove to the co-op that carries it and paid an ungodly amount for The Best Sauerkraut In The World. I got home, laid out all my ingredients and started drooling at the prospect of my delicious, most-craved reuben.

And then I couldn’t open the jar.

Why am I telling you this story? Well, it’s simple, really. I couldn’t open the jar because decreased strength in one’s pectoral muscles is a side-effect of breast reconstruction with expanders. This time ten months ago, I couldn’t even have strapped myself into a car, or even driven, for that matter. It’s little things like this that are the reality of life post-op – whether you’re me, or Angelina Jolie, or the thousands of other women who have opted for preventive mastectomy and reconstruction.

As a third-shifter, I am also up at ungodly hours of the night, so imagine my pleasant surprise when a member of my support group posted an op-ed on the New York Times regarding medical choices when faced with a diagnosis of a BRCA mutation. Then imagine my surprise when, halfway down the article, I read the phrase ‘my partner, Brad Pitt’. My eyes flew up to the top of the page and there it was, in that stark gray New York Times text: ‘by Angelina Jolie’.

I didn’t quite know it then, but the next 48 hours would be full of fielding questions, editing personal stories for Young Previvors, and tweetbombing a few of my personal favorite celebrities (sorry, Natalie Morales and Gideon Emery!) It’s only just now that I’ve actually had time to pen a few thoughts about what’s been going on.

Like most of my sistren in my support group, I was simultaneously thrilled by the prospect of an A-list celebrity speaking up and lending awareness to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and dismayed by the media and public reception of said announcement. But it wasn’t until I read these articles that I started getting really angry.

“I’m 25, and I Have the Angie Gene.”

“I had the Angelina Jolie Mastectomy.”

Wait. What? I mean, all this exposure – great. You know what they say: “No press is bad press.” And while breast cancer is definitely on the radar – one need only take one look at the vomit-pink legions of websites out there to know that – ovarian cancer is sadly not as much, and hereditary exposure to eitheris sadly lacking a lot of coverage.

But when I read headlines like this, I feel like my experience is trivialized. Yes, Angelina had this surgery and yes, she was back to normal not too long after. So was I – I was back to work, in limited fashion, within a couple of weeks – but that is not everyone’s story.

Ladies and gentlemen, preventive mastectomy and reconstruction is not as easy as walking into a surgery center and walking out with a new set of breasts. Let me give you the dirty nasty of it, and this is from a textbook-perfect, no-complications procedure. From start to finish, these are some of the things I had to deal with:

  • People questioning my decision. (to which I would have answered with this Tumblr entry, if it had existed last year)
  • Getting the time off work and having to explain my situation to qualify for FMLA leave – an almost insurmountable task, in and of itself
  • Deciding whether or not I would opt for a bilateral oopherectomy at the same time. I decided not to, but that’s a post for another day.
  • Explaining my decision to every. single. well-meaning. nurse and doctor at the hospital where I had my procedure
  • A two-night stay in hospital over Independence Day weekend, and sharing a hallway with a narcotic-seeking frequent flier
  • Being under the influence of enough painkillers to down a horse for almost a week. One gets so excited about having a week off work until one realizes that entire time will be spent in an opiate haze (and don’t suggest marijuana to me; it’s more than my job’s worth to try!)
  • Two Jackson-Pratt drains underneath my skin and wrapped around the expanders, which had to be drained three times daily. AJ had six. SIX?! I could barely even deal with two.
  • Sleeping on the couch for two weeks, sleeping with five thousand pillows underneath me for three more, and not being able to sleep on my stomach for six months.
  • The feeling of two rock hard pits of saline underneath my pectoralis muscles. Occasionally they would start to migrate toward my armpit, and in the early days, they wibbled and wobbled painfully under my flesh.
  • Fielding well-meaning inquiry by coworkers, friends, and family, which is appreciated, but exhausting
  • Exchange surgery in a day-surgery center. I cried more during my exchange than anything else: the nurses here were cold, rude, and performed their tasks in a way that was so perfunctory it bordered on brutal. I was in constant pain, they didn’t listen to me, and busted a vein in the process.
  • Returning to work only to find out that no, lifting a four-liter jug of water and reaching for racks of samples is not a good idea four days post-op
  • Getting new insurance and having to fight for nipple reconstruction.

It’s not glamorous, it’s not A-list; the above is the nitty-gritty, which is to say nothing – nothing – of what the ladies that call themselves the Complication Nation have to deal with. The worst part is that the articles that offended me so badly are actually well-thought out and well written. However, in a nation of people that read headlines and little else, suddenly I find myself having to explain that yes, everyone has this gene, it’s a mutation in said gene that causes my increased risk of breast cancer, and yes, really, it is not just breast but ovarian cancer, as well, and yes, absolutely I do think Angelina Jolie was brave in coming out in the face of all the public scrutiny she’d receive.

So, let me take the time to remind my readers, however many of you there are, of a few things.

When you are BRCA-positive, you have a lot of very tough decisions to make. The decision to remove my breasts was easy for me, but it can be very hard for others to make. I still struggle with the idea of losing my ovaries and am desperately hoping that the studies on salpingectomy (removing one’s fallopian tubes instead of all the plumbing) pan out.

BRCA mutations have been documented for years and research is ongoingIf you have the resources, I highly suggest donating to the newly-founded Basser Research Center for BRCA, which has ongoing studies in outreach, risk assessment, prevention of hereditary cancer, and treatment

Preventive mastectomy and oopherectomy are not your only options for prevention. Thousands of carriers of BRCA mutations, both female and male (and yes, men can and DO carry BRCA mutations, and it does affect them!) have opted for surveillance options, including semi-annual MRI and mammography, CA125 monitoring, and preventive tamoxifen regimens. If you are not comfortable with the idea of removing your tissue, you do have options.

Because I chose to remove my breasts, I did not opt for self-mutilation. I read this article and absolutely fumed. More accurately, I stormed around the house spewing expletives, none of which are appropriate for the blog, or for public usage. Doubtless some were creative, I’m sure. Let me emphasize this: While clean eating and exercise are always a great idea, for carriers of BRCA mutations, no amount of juicing, raspberry ketones, homeopathic treatment, or chemical avoidance will mitigate the fact that one of your biological pathways is broken.

I suppose that’s probably it. I will step off my soapbox for now, and leave you with some links and resources that may help you sort out this post-NYT babble:

Thanks for reading!

Image provided by Flickr user dullhunk. Used under a Creative Commons license

Nipple delay

Wondering what a nipple delay is? I was too! I hadn’t heard of this procedure until Angelina Jolie announced to the world that she underwent a prophylactic double mastectomy and this procedure was part of the process.

Since that announcement, many different articles and opinions have been published. A lot of them positive, but a few negative. That’s another post for another day. A few pieces did provide more information on the nipple delay procedure.

Breast Reconstruction Guidebook Figure 1.1What is nipple delay?

During the nipple delay procedure, the surgeon makes an incision in the skin and severs the breast tissue and blood vessels directly beneath the nipple (it remains attached to the surrounding skin). Due to this, the nipple is no longer dependent upon the blood supply directly beneath it and becomes accustomed to getting its blood supply through the skin. According to the Pink Lotus Breast Center blog, it actually recruits additional blood flow not previously established.

This is an uncommon procedure. If it is elected, it is performed some time before the mastectomy; two weeks for Angelina Jolie.

Why have a nipple delay?

Surgical nipple delay is used to decrease likelihood of nipple necrosis, which can occur because of loss of blood supply and can lead to nipple loss, following a nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Breast skin is fragile after mastectomy. If it’s exceptionally thin after the breast tissue is cut away or is handled too roughly, it may die. The same result may occur if the breast surgeon severs too many blood vessels that feed the skin or uses eletrocautery too aggressively and burns the inside of the skin, which may then blister and die.
– Steligo, Kathy. Breast Reconstruction Guidebook: Issues and Answers from Research to Recovery. Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012. Print, third edition.

I was not informed of this option prior to my own nipple-sparing mastectomy. My compromised blood flow resulted in necrosis on my left breast and I lost a nipple. If you are interested in reading about my bout with necrosis (including photos) and the hyperbaric treatment I underwent in an effort to thwart it, please read Tissue necrosis.

Related articles:

Source of Figure 1.1: Steligo, Kathy. Breast Reconstruction Guidebook: Issues and Answers from Research to Recovery. Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012. Print, third edition.